Electron wave functions in a cylindrical well (2D Quantum Corral)
In this tutorial we demonstrate 2D simulation of a cilindrical quantum well. We will see the electron eigenstates and their degeneracy.
Input files used in this tutorial are the followings:
2DQuantumCorral_nn3.in / *_nnp.in
Structure
A cylindrical InAs quantum well (diameter 80 nm) is surrounded by a cylindrical GaAs barrier (20 nm) which is surrounded by air. The whole sample is 160 nm x 160 nm.
We assume infinite GaAs barriers. This can be achieved by a circular quantum cluster with Dirichlet boundary conditions, i.e. the wave function is forced to be zero in the GaAs barrier.
The electron mass of InAs is assumed to be isotropic and parabolic (
).Strain is not taken into account.

Simulation outcome
Electron wave functions
The size of the quantum cluster is a circle of diameter
The following figures shows the square of the electron wave functions (i.e.
1st eigenstate,
2nd eigenstate,
3rd eigenstate,
4th eigenstate,
5th eigenstate,
6th eigenstate,
15th eigenstate,
20th eigenstate,
22th eigenstate,
The parameters of the quantum corral are the followings:
radius:
nm for for
The analytical solution of the eigenstates of this quantum well is:
where
is the Bessel function of the first kind (We cite them for below.) is its zero point i.e. and are constant
The corresponding eigenenergies are:
The Quantum number
(the number of zero points in the radial direction)
(the number of zero points in the circumferential direction)/2

Figure 2.4.164 Bessel functions of the first kind for
Energy spectrum
The following figure shows the energy spectrum of the quantum corral. (The zero of energy corresponds to the InAs conduction band edge.)

The two-fold degeneracies of the states
(2, 3), (4, 5), (7, 8), (9, 10), (11, 12), (13, 14), (16, 17), (18, 19), (20, 21), (22, 23), (24, 25), (26, 27), (28, 29), (31, 32), (33, 34), (35, 36), (37, 38), (39, 40)
correponds to
The analytical energy values are:
There is a formula to approximate
Here we describe the comparison between the analytical values, approximate values, nextnano++ results and nextnano³ results.
1st |
[1, 0] |
2.405 |
0.75 |
0.00530 |
0.00508 |
0.00510 |
0.00511 |
2nd |
[1, 1] |
3.832 |
1.25 |
0.01345 |
0.01412 |
0.01294 |
0.01298 |
3rd |
[1,-1] |
3.832 |
1.25 |
0.01345 |
0.01412 |
0.01294 |
0.01298 |
4th |
[1, 2] |
5.136 |
1.75 |
0.02416 |
0.02768 |
0.02320 |
0.02325 |
5th |
[1,-2] |
5.136 |
1.75 |
0.02416 |
0.02768 |
0.02329 |
0.02325 |
6th |
[2, 0] |
5.520 |
1.75 |
0.02791 |
0.02767 |
0.02685 |
0.02693 |
7th |
[2, 1] |
7.016 |
2.25 |
0.04508 |
0.04574 |
0.03584 |
0.03597 |
Further details about the analytical solution of the cylindrical quantum well with infinite barriers can be found in:
The Physics of Low-Dimensional Semiconductors - An IntroductionJohn H. DaviesCambridge University Press (1998)
Last update: nn/nn/nnnn